Skip to main content

If I was vs. If I were: What's the Difference?

One of the most common mistakes in English is the incorrect usage of the phrase 'If I was' . In fact, you will hear native speakers commonly make this mistake. Here are a few examples of this mistake:

1. If I was you, I would try to find a new job.

2. If she was here, she would explain the situation.

In both sentences, 'was' is used instead of the correct form 'were'. However, sometimes If I was or If she was is correct! 

Here are two examples:

1. If I was late for class, the teacher gave me extra homework.

2. If he was asked a question, he replied quickly and honestly.

What's the difference between these two types of sentences? Why is one correct and the other not? The answer is that the first two sentences are used to express imaginary situations. These sentences require the subjective form 'were' for all subjects

1. If I were you, I would try to find a new job.

2. If she were here, she would explain the situation.

The second group of sentences refers to a situation that was always true in the past. In this case, the past simple is used.

If I were is used to express an imaginary situation in the present.

1. If I were you, I would take a vacation.

2. I would give the test again if I were the teacher.

If I was is used to express something that was true when or if something else happened:

1. If I was late for class, I got into trouble.

2. I had to do extra homework, If I was absent.

Imaginary, Unreal, or Second Conditional

The second conditional is also known as the imaginary or unreal conditional. Use the imaginary conditional to speak about situations which are contrary to fact. Use the following structures:

If + Subject + Simple Past (Subjunctive) + Objects, Subject + Would + Verb + Objects

1. If I had more time, I would take up a new hobby.

2. If Ruth moved to Lagos, she would get an apartment in Victoria Island.

The simple past in the imaginary conditional is actually the subjunctive voice. The only grammatical difference between the two is in the use of the verb 'be'. In this case, all subjects take were:

1. If she were more honest, she would admit fault.

2. If they were in town, we would go out for dinner.

Remember that it is also possible to end the sentence with an 'if' clause. In this case, do not use a comma to separate the two clauses:

Subject + Would + Verb + Objects If + Subject + Simple Past + Objects

1. The school would hire more teachers if the district voted for a tax increase.

2. The economy would improve if the people paid less for. 


We hope you will find this post useful.

We welcome your comments, observations and suggestions.

Best regards!

From the Grammarstar team.

Comments

Khadijat said…
Nice 👏

Popular posts from this blog

Some wrongly used words

In this lesson, we shall consider some words that are often used wrongly. These words almost sound alike, and that is where the confusion lies. The speaker or writer may mean to express one thing, but will end up using another word for it. We shall see those words in the following pairs: Defy and defile Defy : to refuse to obey; to resist or fight. E.g., i. He defied his parents and embarked on the journey. ii. The protesting students have continued to defy all effort to stop them. Defile : to make unclean; to violate; to desecrate. E.g., i. The man was accused of defiling the minor. ii. The young man defiled the shrine when he walked in with his shoes Eligible and legible  Eligible : permitted; qualified; suitable. E.g., i. Only eligible voters can participate during elections. ii. He was not chosen for the competition becuase he was not eligible. Legible : readable. E.g., i. His handwriting is not legible. ii. The document is very legible. Perpetuate and perpetrate  Perpetuate : to c

Round off or round up?

Did you know that round off and round up mean different things? Look at these: Round off: conclude or summarize 1. The moderator signaled the guest speaker to round off his speech. 2. "Please, round off. Time is no more on our side," the man said. Round up: arrest or gather 1. The police rounded up the criminals last Friday. 2. The Maths teacher asked the students to  round up the figures to a whole number. I hope you can see the difference now. Please, leave a comment, questions and suggestions on the post. Kindly share after reading. Thanks.

Lacking behind or lagging behind?

The above is a phrasal verb we often use when we want to express a slow movement in carrying out a task or an action. Before we proceed, it is important we explain what a phrasal verb is.  A phrasal verb is an expression formed by a combination of a verb and a preposition or adverb or both and functions as a verb whose meaning is different from the combined meanings of the individual words. For example: take off, take on, look up to, etc. These words cannot be explained by the individual words, but by considering all the words combined. The focus of this lesson is to consider whether to use the word 'lack' or 'lag' together with 'behind' to express that.  More often than not, most second users of English language, especially high school students and social media users, get confused at the correct words to use in situations such as this. Such persons, sometimes, rely on people they deem to be more learned than they are and copy from them without checking to verif